Flysikkerhet under omstillingsprosesser
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapporten oppsummerer resultatene fra en studie av erfaringer fra andre land vedrørende sikkerhetsmessige konsekvenser av omstillingsprosesser innen luftfart og enkelte andre sikkerhetskritiske virksomheter. Hovedvekten er lagt på å samle erfaringer med omstillingsprosesser innen svensk luftfart gjennom intervjuer, gruppesamtaler, dokumentstudier og gjennomgang av utvalgte sikkerhetsindikatorer. I tillegg har vi rapportert erfaringer fra USA og Storbritannia vedrørende deregulering og privatisering innen henholdsvis luftfart og jernbane. Videre har vi gjennomgått analyser av Challenger-ulykken og en flyulykke ved Dryden i Canada med sikte på å finne eventuelle interessante paralleller til problemstillingen i norsk luftfart . Detaljerte analyser og resultater er dokumentert i separate notater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".