Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article propose une lecture de la pensée et des formes d’actualisation politique et culturelle d’un penseur du mouvement noir contemporain au Brésil, Abdias Nascimento. À travers les écrits politiques de cet auteur, il est possible de retracer les interprétations des actions privilégiées dans la lutte contre les discriminations qui ont suivi et suivent toujours l’expérience post-abolitionniste. L’adhésion à la pensée de la décolonisation puis à celle de l’afrocentrisme, et aussi à une version du panafricanisme qu’est le quilombisme (et dont il est l’auteur), n’a pas empêché cet intellectuel de la diaspora de penser l’émancipation depuis le continent latino-américain, et plus particulièrement depuis le Brésil. La perspective selon laquelle la fin de l’esclavage n’aurait pas eu lieu, leitmotiv du mouvement noir contemporain au Brésil et dont Nascimento est une figure fondatrice, permet l’établissement d’un parallèle entre les luttes du mouvement noir et celles du mouvement contre l’esclavage contemporain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".