Polyploidism in Deep Neural Networks: m-Parent Evolutionary Synthesis of Deep Neural Networks in Varying Population Sizes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evolutionary deep intelligence was recently proposed to organicallyproduce highly efficient deep neural network architecturesover successive generations. Thus far, current evolutionary synthesisprocesses are based on asexual reproduction, i.e., offspringneural networks are synthesized stochastically from a single parentnetwork. In this study, we investigate the effects of m-parentsexual evolutionary synthesis (m = 1, 2, 3, 5) in combination withvarying population sizes of three, five, and eight synthesized networksper generation. Experimental results were obtained usinga 10% subset of the MNIST handwritten digits dataset, and showthat increasing the number of parent networks results in improvedarchitectural efficiency of the synthesized networks (approximately150x synaptic efficiency and approximately 42–49x cluster efficiency)while resulting in only a 2–3% drop in testing accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it