Estrategias para la difusión de los itinerarios culturales: el Camino Real de Tierra Adentro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El concepto de itinerario cultural es relativamente nuevo, ya que fue aprobado en el año 2008, durante la 16ª.Asamblea General del Icomos, celebrada en Quebec, Canadá. Este concepto es muestra –como lo afirma su preámbulo– de la evolución de las ideas acerca de la visión de este concepto y de la importancia que cobran el entorno y la escala territorial.La conservación de un bien del patrimonio mundial depende en gran medida del grado de conocimiento y apropiación que tenga la comunidad en la que este se sitúa y de cómo se presente al exterior. Esta presentación se deberá hacer siguiendo parámetros de ética y utilizando las herramientas y técnicas adecuadas, para lo cual el Icomos ha creado documentos específicos como son las cartas generadas por los distintos comités científicos.El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro, primer itinerario cultural inscrito en la Lista del Patrimonio Mundial en el año 2010, representa un reto en cuanto a su difusión y promoción, dada la complejidad y variedad de los sitios que lo componen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".