MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771342806 · doi:10.1080/23802014.2017.1402667

Ritual revitalisation as adaptation to environmental stress: skull-blessing in Bidayuh communities of Borneo

2017· article· en· W2771342806 on OpenAlexfundno aff
June Mary Rubis

Bibliographic record

VenueThird World Thematics A TWQ Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMount Allison UniversityOriel College, University of Oxford
KeywordsBlessingAdaptation (eye)EthnographyEnvironmental stressEnvironmental governanceSociologyCorporate governanceGeographyEnvironmental ethicsAnthropologyArchaeologyEnvironmental protectionPsychologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ritual revival can be a powerful way to organise social response to environmental stress. This case study examined how Bidayuh communities in Borneo sought to revitalise a skull-blessing ritual (Gawea Nyobang) as an adaptive social response to environmental stress. A mixed-method approach of literature review, semi-structured interviews, participant observation and collaborative ethnography was applied to this study. Results suggest that the ritual revival addresses both environmental and social factors, and possibly relies on polycentric governance and multiple-leadership. Based on these findings, a framework for an emerging revitalisation movement is developed, which is adaptive, pragmatic, and visionary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThird World Thematics A TWQ JournalSame topicAsian Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207