Marble MLFQ: An educational visualization tool for the multilevel feedback queue algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the behaviour of algorithms is a key element of computer science. However, this learning objective is not always easy to achieve, as the behaviour of some algorithms is complicated or not readily observable, or affected by the values of their input parameters. To assist students in learning the multilevel feedback queue scheduling algorithm (MLFQ), we designed and developed an interactive visualization tool, Marble MLFQ, that illustrates how the algorithm works under various conditions. The tool is intended to supplement course material and instructions in an undergraduate operating systems course. The main features of Marble MLFQ are threefold: (1) It animates the steps of the scheduling algorithm graphically to allow users to observe its behaviour; (2) It provides a series of lessons to help users understand various aspects of the algorithm; and (3) It enables users to customize input values to the algorithm to support exploratory learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it