César Aira's Life in Pink: Beyond Gender Games in "Cómo me hice monja"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C?mo me hice monja, de C?sar Aira, escritor argentino hiperprol?fico, vanguar dista, bohemio y no bohemio a la vez, es una parodia del Bildungsroman y del Kunstlerroman. Aunque es comparable con la pel?cula francobelga Ma vie en rose, de Alain Berliner, no ataca tanto el sistema de roles sexuales, sino el realismo burgu?s que fundamenta el sistema y otros componentes del sentido com?n. La novela destroza autobiografemas como la desidentificaci?n con los padres, el aprender a leer, el uso del lenguaje como arma y el erotismo ambivalente de la juventud, pero sin la t?ctica modernista y posmodernista de la interrupci?n, sino mediante el continuo de una voz narrativa cuyo sitio enunciativo es contradicto rio. La resistencia inconsciente a las formas m?s b?sicas de la interpelaci?n althusseriana lleva a nuestra narradora a una muerte pegajosa y rosada, y a nuestro autor a una nueva mezcla de lo c?mico, lo metaficticio y hasta lo metaf?sico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".