MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771405653 · doi:10.1109/nfv-sdn.2017.8169836

Genetic algorithms with particle swarm optimization based mutation for distributed controller placement in SDNs

2017· article· en· W2771405653 on OpenAlexaff
Lingxia Liao, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle swarm optimizationController (irrigation)Pareto principleMathematical optimizationConvergence (economics)Computer sciencePosition (finance)Multi-swarm optimizationGenetic algorithmControl theory (sociology)GeneralityMutationMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a distributed controller placement problem that finds out the pareto optimal solutions minimizing the switch-to-controller delay, controller-to-controller delay, and controller load imbalance for wide area software defined networks. We introduce a general model that not only considers the controller placements but also the switch assignments, so that this model can further be used to develop many other multi-objective optimization problems such as energy saving, controller migration, or NFV allocation. To solve this problem with huge search space without losing generality, we introduce a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) with a particle swarm optimization based mutation function. It maintains a pre-calculated global best position for each single objective, and choose the global best position of an objective that has the best accordance to a parent to guide the mutation of the parent. Evaluations show that our MOGA can generate a pareto frontier with a larger diversity toward the given global best positions in much shorter convergence time than a general MOGA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207