MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771439589 · doi:10.5430/ijfr.v9n1p31

Macroeconomic Factors and Corporate Capital Structure: Evidence from Listed Joint Stock Companies in Vietnam

2017· article· en· W2771439589 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Phan Thi Quoc Huong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Finance and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapital structureProfitability indexBusinessMonetary economicsStock (firearms)Risk-adjusted return on capitalCapital formationStock exchangeFinanceFinancial systemFinancial capitalEconomicsHuman capitalEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is conducted to examine how macro determinants affect capital structure of non-financial joint stock companies in Vietnam. The two-step system GMM is used to analyze data which is a combination of two sources: financial statements of 464 listed joint stock companies on 3 main stock exchanges (HOSE, HNX, and UPCOM), and World Bank database in the period of 2008-2015. The findings show that firms’ capital structure decisions are impacted by elements which reflect macroeconomic conditions. In detail, the inflation rate has positive influence while corporate income tax rate is on the contrary. Besides, the affectation of financial development and institutional quality on capital structure of these enterprises is found clearly. Not only macro factors, this research explores but also other determinants which are characteristics company such as size, profitability, and payment capacity. Finally, it is noticeable that capital structure decisions depend on capital structure of the previous year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Financial ResearchSame topicCorporate Finance and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207