Fabrication and characterization of individually ballasted carbon nanotube field emitter arrays using doped silicon resistor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, individually ballasted carbon nanotube (CNT) field emitter arrays (FEAs) using a doped silicon ballast resistor are designed and fabricated. Each CNT field emitter is in series with an n-type doped silicon resistor with 10μm in length, a doping concentration of 1014cm-3and a cross section area of 1 μm2to limit FE current from a single emitter no more than 1.2 μA. A systematic study and discussion are described by fabricating and characterizing A CNT FEA with 8260 CNT emitters in a 1 mm2octagonal area with an inter-emitter distance of 10 μm and a 10×10 CNT FEA. Benefitting from the saturation of drift velocity in doped silicon, the FE current can be successfully limited at a high current level without sacrificing the sensitivity and efficiency of electron extracting. The proposed approach is able to improve our CNT cathode reliability and stability for practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".