Disordered speech quality estimation using linear prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tracheoesophageal (TE) speech is generated by patients who have undergone a total laryngectomy where the larynx (voice box) is removed and replaced by a tracheoesophageal puncture. This work presents a novel low complexity algorithm to estimate the degree of severity of disordered TE speech. The proposed algorithm uses features which are computed from 32-ms voiced frames of the speech signal. A 21-st order LPC analysis is performed on each voiced frame of the speech and high order statistics (central moments: mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis) are extracted from the LPC coefficients, Cepstral coefficients and the LPC residual signal. The averages of each of these moments are computed along with the pitch average over all voiced frames yielding a total of 14 quality features. Experimental results with two sets of databases (20 and 35 TE speakers) showed that the proposed speech quality estimation approach performs well with a correlation with subjective scores in the range between 0.81 and 0.86.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".