Characterizing the Tautomers of Protonated Aniline Using Differential Mobility Spectrometry and Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The site of protonation for gas-phase aniline has been debated for many years, with many research groups contributing experimental and computational evidence for either the amino-protonated or the para-carbon-protonated tautomer as the gas-phase global minimum structure. Here, we employ differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) and mass spectrometry (MS) to separate and characterize the amino-protonated (N-protonated) and para-carbon-protonated ( p-protonated) tautomers of aniline. We demonstrate that upon electrospray ionization (ESI), aniline is protonated predominantly at the amino position. Similar analyses are conducted on another three isotopically labeled forms of aniline to confirm our structural assignments. We observe a significant reduction of the relative population of the p-protonated tautomer when a protic ESI solvent is employed (methanol/water) compared to when an aprotic solvent (acetonitrile) is employed. We also observe conversion of the p-protonated species into the N-protonated species upon clustering with protic solvent vapor post-DMS selection-a finding supported by previous experimental data acquired using DMS-MS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".