MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771697824 · doi:10.3897/zookeys.721.20287

Revision of the species of Lytopylus from Area de Conservación Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae)

2017· article· en· W2771697824 on OpenAlexaff
Ilgoo Kang, Eric G. Chapman, Daniel H. Janzen, Winnie Hallwachs, Tanya Dapkey, M. Alex Smith, Michael J. Sharkey

Bibliographic record

VenueZooKeys · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBraconidaeDNA barcodingBiologyCaterpillarHymenopteraLepidoptera genitaliaKey (lock)LarvaMitochondrial DNAZoologyEcologyBotanyParasitoidGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thirty two new species ofLytopylus(Agathidinae) are described with image plates for each species:Lytopylus alejandromasisisp. n.,Lytopylus alfredomainierisp. n.,Lytopylus anamariamongeaesp. n.,Lytopylus angelagonzalezaesp. n.,Lytopylus cesarmoraisp. n.,Lytopylus eddysanchezisp. n.,Lytopylus eliethcantillanoaesp. n.,Lytopylus ericchapmanisp. n.,Lytopylus gahyunaesp. n.,Lytopylus gisukaesp. n.,Lytopylus guillermopereiraisp. n.,Lytopylus gustavoinduniisp. n.,Lytopylus hartmanguidoisp. n.,Lytopylus hernanbravoisp. n.,Lytopylus hokwonisp. n.,Lytopylus ivanniasandovalaesp. n.,Lytopylus johanvalerioisp. n.,Lytopylus josecortesisp. n.,Lytopylus luisgaritaisp. n.,Lytopylus mariamartachavarriaesp. n.,Lytopylus miguelviquezisp. n.,Lytopylus motohasegawaisp. n.,Lytopylus okchunaesp. n.,Lytopylus pablocobbisp. n.,Lytopylus robertofernandezisp. n.,Lytopylus rogerblancoisp. n.,Lytopylus salvadorlopezisp. n.,Lytopylus sangyeonisp. n.,Lytopylus sarahmeierottoaesp. n.,Lytopylus sergiobermudezisp. n.,Lytopylus sigifredomarinisp. n., andLytopylus youngcheaesp. n.A dichotomous key and a link to an electronic, interactive key are included. All specimens were reared from Lepidoptera larvae collected in Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG) and all are associated with ecological information including host caterpillar, collection date, eclosion date, caterpillar food plant, and locality. Neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood analyses of the barcode region of the mitochondrial cytochromecoxidase subunit I gene (COI DNA barcode) were conducted to aid in species delimitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZooKeysSame topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207