MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W277170103 · doi:10.29173/slw7090

Editorial: School Library Education

2000· editorial· en· W277170103 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julie I. Tallman

Bibliographic record

VenueSchool Libraries Worldwide · 2000
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchool libraryInformation literacyThe InternetReading (process)General partnershipLiteracyDeveloping countryPedagogySociologyInformation seekingPublic relationsMedical educationLibrary sciencePolitical sciencePsychologyWorld Wide WebComputer scienceMedicineEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The articles in this issue represent a microcosm of the issues confronting teacher-librarian education for developing countries and developed countries. At first glance, the professional literature appears divided between two camps. Authors from westernized cultures have offered articles on contemporary school library issues such as leadership, information literacy skills, collaborative partnership with classroom teachers, and the use of the Internet for seeking information and online courses. In this issue, we also hear from authors in the developing country of Botswana about its basic need for skilled teacher-librarians who can effectively establish and manage libraries and run library programs that encourage information-seeking behaviors among students and teachers unaccustomed to a written literacy and reading culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0140.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchool Libraries WorldwideSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207