Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through aerostructural optimization, this paper presents progress toward characterizing the potential efficiency gains of drooped wings for commercial aircraft in transonic flight. The drooped wing is a nonplanar configuration with downward spanwise camber from the wing root to the tip. The aerostructural optimization cases include two load conditions: cruise and . The single maneuver load condition is used for structural sizing of the wing. In all cases, the projected span of the wing remains unchanged. The results show that such a wing has the potential to improve aircraft range by 2.6% relative to an optimized planar wing of the same projected span. The reason is that the drooped wing pushes the tip vortex further away than the planar wing and increases the projected span at the deflected state. Furthermore, if the drooped wing is permitted to have curved leading and trailing edges, a 4.9% range improvement in comparison to an optimized planar wing with straight leading and trailing edges is possible by further reducing wing weight and wave drag.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it