MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771725210 · doi:10.1002/admt.201700207

Robust Superhydrophobic Laser‐Induced Graphene for Desalination Applications

2017· article· en· W2771725210 on OpenAlexafffund
Collin M. Tittle, Dilara Yilman, Michael A. Pope, C. Backhouse

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials Technologies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDesalinationMembrane distillationFabricationMaterials scienceGrapheneNanotechnologyContact angleMembraneDistilled waterWater desalinationDurabilityComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The fabrication of long‐lived, durable, superhydrophobic surfaces using a manufacturable process is an important challenge for material science. Significant advances have been reported; however, many surfaces suffer from fragility, nonmanufacturable fabrication techniques, and temporal instability. Such challenges have limited commercial scale application of superhydrophobic films, including their application to water desalination where long lifetimes and durability are essential. The fabrication of controllably wettable surfaces formed from laser‐induced graphene is demonstrated in atmospheric conditions with contact angle control from 59° to 176°; representing some of the most superhydrophobic carbon surfaces ever reported. This superhydrophobicity is used to engineer a membrane with the largest pores ever reported for the energy efficient water desalination technique of air‐gapped membrane distillation. State‐of‐the‐art production of distilled water is observed, and no membrane failure or loss of superhydrophobicity is observed on a time‐scale of months—suggesting total water production capabilities well beyond anything yet demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Materials TechnologiesSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207