MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771730309 · doi:10.1520/gtj20160254

Design and Performance of an In-Flight Rainfall Simulator in a Geotechnical Centrifuge

2017· article· en· W2771730309 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentrifugeGeotechnical engineeringIntensity (physics)ReplicateEnvironmental scienceGeologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this paper is to present the design details and performance of an actuator for simulating in-flight rainfall at enhanced gravity levels in centrifuge. The developed simulator is capable of inducing in-flight rainfall of various intensities (varying from 10 mm/h to 80 mm/h in prototype dimensions) and durations (over a year continuously in prototype dimensions) on geotechnical structures using specially designed pneumatic nozzles. The intensity and duration of rainfall can be regulated at any point of time in the in-flight condition to replicate prototype natural hazards, ranging from long-term medium intensity rainfall to a short spell of very high intensity rainfall. The various components of the developed simulator are discussed, with special emphasis on measures adopted to nullify Coriolis effects on droplet trajectory. Furthermore, the simulator produces rainfall in the form of fine mist at high gravities, which neutralizes chances of erosion due to impact of raindrops. In the present paper, a total of six calibration tests at high gravities and four centrifuge model tests on a typical silty sand slope were carried out using a 4.5-m radius large beam geotechnical centrifuge facility available at IIT Bombay, India. The analysis and interpretation of calibration results indicated that uniform rainfall intensity could be achieved over entire model surface area, and they were further applied to implement the scaling laws involved in modelling of rainfall in a geotechnical centrifuge. The model tests on silty sand slope indicated a rise in phreatic surface with ingress of rainwater, accompanied by face deformations and surface settlements, which increased in magnitude with higher rainfall intensities. In addition, the phreatic surfaces induced during rainfall using the developed simulator and time corresponding to failure observed in centrifuge were compared with numerical results using Geostudio 2012 (Geo-Slope, Calgary, Canada) and were found to corroborate well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it