MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771777462 · doi:10.3917/mav.096.0143

Les transferts de valeurs éco-responsables de l’événement aux parties prenantes sont-ils perçus par les touristes ?

2017· article· fr· W2771777462 on OpenAlex
Élisabeth Robinot, Léo Trespeuch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement & Avenir · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cette étude est d’ identifier la présence de transferts de valeurs éco-responsables entre un événement éco-responsable, la destination touristique et les entreprises partenaires au travers de la perception des consommateurs. Pour ce faire, le champ théorique du sponsoring est mobilisé et deux approches qualitatives ont été réalisées. La première repose sur des entretiens semi-directifs auprès de spectateurs in situ et la seconde sur une netnographie des communautés virtuelles réunies autour des événements. Les principaux résultats montrent un partage de valeurs environnementales entre l’événement et la destination touristique. Pour les consommateurs, les destinations touristiques et les responsables de l’événement sont solidaires et co-responsables de la préservation des lieux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it