MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771782323 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2017.8216454

Stability study of power hardware in the loop (PHIL)simulations with a real solar inverter

2017· article· en· W2771782323 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHardware-in-the-loop simulationStability (learning theory)InverterLoop (graph theory)Power (physics)Computer sciencePower inverterPhotovoltaic systemControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringEmbedded systemMathematicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Thermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Stability issues in PHIL simulations has always been of major concern due to the inherent delays within the interface devices. Various control algorithms are proposed in literature to overcome this problem. The paper uses a simple filtering technique followed by compensation blocks to overcome the stability problem. This paper further proposes a mathematical approach to consider the stability problem. This approach can be further investigated to design the interface devices that can guarantee the system stability. The stable operation of PHIL system with linear and non-linear devices was analyzed and experimentally verified. A 140W grid connected Solar inverter in a PHIL showed a stable operation even during transients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it