MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771828680 · doi:10.1111/1754-9485.12694

Apparent transverse relaxation () on <scp>MRI</scp> as a method to differentiate treatment effect (pseudoprogression) versus progressive disease in chemoradiation for malignant glioma

2017· article· en· W2771828680 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Guy Belliveau, Glenn Bauman, David R. Macdonald, Maria MacDonald, L. Martyn Klassen, Ravi S. Menon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMedicineGliomaRadiologyNuclear medicineDiseasePathologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Pseudoprogression (ps PD ) is a transient post‐treatment imaging change that is commonly seen when treating glioma with chemotherapy and radiation. The use of apparent transverse relaxation rate ( ), which is calculated from a contrast‐free multi‐echo gradient echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging ( MRI ) sequence, may allow for quantitative identification of patients with suspected ps PD . Methods We acquired a multi‐echo gradient echo sequence using a 3T‐Siemens Prisma MRI . The signal decay through the echoes was fitted to provide the coefficient. We segmented the T 1 ‐gadolinium enhancing the image to provide a contrast enhancing lesion ( CEL ) and the FLAIR hyperintensity to provide a non‐enhancing lesion ( NEL ). These regions of interest were applied to the multi‐echo gradient echo to acquire a mean within the CEL and NEL . We additionally acquired ADC data to attempt to corroborate our findings. Results We found that patients who later exhibited PD exhibited a higher within the CEL as well as a higher ratio of CEL to NEL . Our data correctly distinguished pseudoprogression from treatment effect in 9/9 patients, while ADC corrected identified 7/9 patients using an absolute ADC of 1200 × 10 −6 mm 2 /s. Conclusions Our method seems promising for the accurate identification of ps PD , and the technique is amenable to evaluation in larger, multi‐centre patient cohorts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.414 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation OncologySame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207