Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: an anatomical study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Aortic cusp free margins are a central target in most aortic valve repair operations to optimize valve coaptation. The objective of this anatomical study was to analyse the normal dimensions of free margin length (FML) and coaptation surface and to analyse their relationship with other valve and root dimensions in normal tricuspid aortic valves. METHODS: We analysed 25 aortic root homografts. Eight valve and root measurements were obtained from fresh specimens including the length of the free margin while applying appropriate tension on the structures. The valves were then fixed with formalin in the diastolic position under pressure to allow measurement of the coaptation surface. In addition to normal values, we analysed the correlations and ratios between the different measures. RESULTS: The mean FML was 34.3 ± 3.1 mm. The FML was similar between the 3 cusps and correlated with all other valve and root measures. The ratio of the FML to the geometric height was 1.81, and the free edge length/sinotubular junction was 1.29. The mean coaptation surface was 122 ± 21 mm2 per cusp and corresponded to 41% of the cusp surface. The central coaptation length was 3.3 ± 0.8 mm, and the lateral coaptation length was 5.9 ± 0.6 mm. The total coaptation surface per specimen was 184 ± 32 mm2. CONCLUSIONS: We described the normal dimensions of the FML and coaptation surface in the tricuspid aortic valve. These measurements will serve in the further development of an objective method of free margin shortening based on intraoperative measurements of the FML to treat cusp prolapse and low coaptation after valve-sparing surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".