MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2771942976 · doi:10.1071/rdv30n1ab136

136 DNA Methylation Status and Transcript Profile of Genes Associated with Lipid Metabolism, Cell Survival, and Pluripotency in Bovine Blastocysts with Different Kinetics of Development

2017· article· en· W2771942976 on OpenAlexaff
Jéssica Ispada, Camila Bruna de Lima, Érika Cristina dos Santos, Kelly Annes, Patrícia Kubo Fontes, Marcelo Fábio Gouveia Nogueira, Marc‐André Sirard, Marcella Pecora Milazzotto

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA methylationMethylationBiologyBlastocystCpG siteEpigeneticsAndrologyGeneMolecular biologyGeneticsGene expressionEmbryoEmbryogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During in vitro production (IVP), blastocysts can be differentiated based on the kinetics of early cleavage. These groups present distinct patterns of global DNA methylation, an epigenetic characteristic generally responsible for suppression (presence of methylation) or activation (absence of methylation) of genes from different biological pathways. This work investigated the DNA methylation and mRNA levels of genes related to embryo development and viability. For this purpose, bovine embryos underwent IVP using conventional protocols. After 40 h of insemination, embryos were classified as FBL (fast cleavage: 4 cells or more) or SBL (slow cleavage: 2 or 3 cells), remaining in culture until blastocyst stage. Sexed semen was used to prevent differences due to sex, even without statistical differences in male:female ratio already reported. Blastocysts (40 per group) were analysed by EmbryoGENE Methylation DNA Array (Ispada et al. 2016 Proc. 49th SSR: 181) and later analysed through BioMark™HD (Fluidigm Corp., South San Francisco, CA, USA) for the transcripts profile. The PPIA gene was used as endogenous control for ?Ct calculation and submitted to Student’s t-test. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identified 47,713 methylated regions (7976 hypermethylated in FBL and 3608 hypermethylated in SBL). Fast embryos presented more hypermethylations distributed throughout the genome, such as introns, exons, promoter and repeat elements, whereas hypermethylation were more present in CpG islands in slow embryos. Differentially methylated regions were clustered by means of biological processes and the most affected pathways were related to lipid metabolism and cell differentiation and survival. Regarding the gene expression analysis, all results are presented in FBL in relation to SBL. Of genes involved in lipid metabolism, ACSL3, ELOVL6, PPARA, and FADS, previously identified as hypermethylated genes, were down-regulated, whereas PPARG and PTGS2 showed no statistical difference; SCD and FASN, although hypomethylated, were also down-regulated, and ACSL6, which did not differ in DNA methylation status, was down-regulated. Of genes involved in survival/death, BAX, HSPA1A, BID, NFE2L2, and GPX1 were hypermethylated; however, the first 2 were up-regulated, BID was down-regulated, and the last 2 were not statistically different. Although CASP9, TXNRD1, and FOXO3 were all hypomethylated, only CASP9 was up-regulated. Also, DDIT3 was down-regulated and NOS2 was up-regulated, although they did not differ in DNA methylation between groups. Of genes involved in cell differentiation, POU5F1 and SALL4 were both hypermethylated, but only the POU5F1 was down-regulated; NANOG, which did not differ in DNA methylation status between groups, was also down-regulated. In conclusion, although we did not find correlation in DNA methylation and RNA levels for all genes evaluated, the chosen pathways were indeed different between groups, which could lead to their potential suppression/activation and affect embryo viability. Also, this lower correlation may be a result of the influence of other epigenetic mechanisms differently activated between groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207