MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772015587 · doi:10.1177/102490790701400101

Patients' Acceptance of “Emergency Nurse Practitioners”

2007· article· en· W2772015587 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CH Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueHong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNursing Roles and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaffingMedicineNursingMinor (academic)Emergency departmentNurse practitionersPublic healthHealth careRegistered nurseMedical emergencyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The public's perception of nurses is changing as a result of their enhanced level of education and training, with many of them now attaining academic qualifications at the same level as doctors, or even higher. Nurse practitioners staffing emergency departments are well established in Australia, Canada, UK and USA. Historically, they were introduced to provide medical care in rural and remote or isolated communities, but financial and resource constraints in public health systems in the 1990's generated impetus for their further growth and development, resulting in nurse practitioners staffing such areas as minor injury units or emergency department observation wards in recent years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHong Kong Journal of Emergency MedicineSame topicNursing Roles and PracticesFrench-language works237,207