MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772569218 · doi:10.2495/sc170501

CLIMATE CHANGES AND DRINKING WATER IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES: IMPACTS AND ADAPTATION

2017· article· en· W2772569218 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manuel J. Rodríguez, Ianis Delpla

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on ecology and the environment · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExploitClimate changeWater resourcesEnvironmental scienceWater qualityEnvironmental planningBusinessWater supplyPrecipitationWater resource managementEnvironmental resource managementSustainable developmentQuality (philosophy)Adaptation (eye)Natural resource economicsEnvironmental engineeringGeographyComputer scienceMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planning and management of sustainable cities must consider the impacts of climate changes on urban water resources. There is a growing concern about how climate changes affect the quality of drinking water from the catchment to the citizen's tap. Changes in precipitation and temperature patterns can have effects on quality of water sources and on the capacity of water treatment and distribution infrastructure to respond with such changes. We present herein a research program that investigates the potential impacts of climate change scenarios on source and drinking water quality. The research methodology is based on a modelling framework that exploit datasets from Canadian cities concerning land use, source and tap water quality, water infrastructure and operations, and estimations on future changes on water temperature and local rainfall. The paper concludes with the initiatives that municipalities must conduct in order to implement sustainable strategies for adapting to climate changes regarding drinking water resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT transactions on ecology and the environmentSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207