RESPON PENUMPANG BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL ADISUTJIPTO YOGYAKARTA TERHADAP PEMINDAHAN LOKASI BANDARA KE KULON PROGO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jumlah penumpang, barang dan jasa transportasi udara di Indonesia menunju kkan angka dan grafik yang terus meningkat. Dalam perkembangannya, pada awal tahun 2003 kapasitas Bandar Udara Internasional Adisutjipto sudah mulai dirasakan tidak layak, maka dengan latar belakang di atas maka penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitalif. Dengan pendekatan tersebut maka didapatkan Respon pengguna jasa penerbangan di Bandar Udara Internasional menunjukan 71% setuju bila bandara Jogja dipindahkan ke daerah Kulon Progo dikarenakan 89% dari responden memberikan respons bahwa lokasi Bandar Udara Internasional Adisutjipto sudah tidak layak lagi untuk menampung jumlah penumpang yang ada di bandara tersebut. Ketidaklayakan daya tampung disebabkan oleh meningkatnya jumlah pengguna jasa penerbangan dari tahun ke tahun
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.130 | 0.044 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".