MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772597127 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2017.8127098

Road width measurement from remote sensing images

2017· article· en· W2772597127 on OpenAlex
Zhichao Xia, Yu Zang, Jonathan Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine (geometry)Computer scienceLine widthRange (aeronautics)PixelCluster analysisLine segmentEnergy (signal processing)Function (biology)Cluster (spacecraft)ParallelRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionGeographyOpticsPhysicsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel approach for road width measurement from high resolution satellite or aerial images. The proposed approach has three main steps. First, we extract line segments and road center lines on the given remote sensing images. Second, we could obtain many pairs of parallel lines with width information by computing the positional relationship between each other. Then K-means is performed to cluster these parallel lines into several clusters by the width information of them. Finally, an energy function is introduced to assign the width range of a cluster to each pixel on road center lines, the width range is viewed as the width of the corresponding road segment. Attribute to parallel lines extraction, parallel lines clustering and our energy function, the proposed road width measurement method is able to provide high quality results on road width measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207