MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772601103 · doi:10.1109/tits.2017.2774186

Mass Evidence Accumulation and Traveler Risk Scoring Engine in e-Border Infrastructure

2017· article· en· W2772601103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsCover (algebra)InferenceComputer scienceDemonstrativeComponent (thermodynamics)EstimationRisk analysis (engineering)Causal inferenceRisk assessmentData scienceOperations researchEngineeringComputer securitySystems engineeringArtificial intelligenceEconometricsBusinessEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with mass evidence accumulation and risk assessment in a particular component of transportation systems and e-borders. We outline the challenges faced by contemporary border control technology and conduct a series of demonstrative experiments that cover critical scenarios, tasks, and states of both evidence accumulation and the traveler risk scoring engine. Using technology gap navigator methodology, this paper suggests an approach to traveler risk estimation based on a unified inference platform, such as a causal graphical model with various incorporated metrics of uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it