Effective implicit finite‐difference method for sensitivity analysis of stiff stochastic discrete biochemical systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulation of cellular processes is achieved through a range of mathematical modelling approaches. Deterministic differential equation models are a commonly used first strategy. However, because many biochemical processes are inherently probabilistic, stochastic models are often called for to capture the random fluctuations observed in these systems. In that context, the Chemical Master Equation (CME) is a widely used stochastic model of biochemical kinetics. Use of these models relies on estimates of kinetic parameters, which are often poorly constrained by experimental observations. Consequently, sensitivity analysis, which quantifies the dependence of systems dynamics on model parameters, is a valuable tool for model analysis and assessment. A number of approaches to sensitivity analysis of biochemical models have been developed. In this study, the authors present a novel method for estimation of sensitivity coefficients for CME models of biochemical reaction systems that span a wide range of time-scales. They make use of finite-difference approximations and adaptive implicit tau-leaping strategies to estimate sensitivities for these stiff models, resulting in significant computational efficiencies in comparison with previously published approaches of similar accuracy, as evidenced by illustrative applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".