MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772730512 · doi:10.1093/jrs/fex030

Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Asylum. By Thomas Spijkerboer (ed)

2017· article· en· W2772730512 on OpenAlex
Diego García Rodríguez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Refugee Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual orientationGender identityGender studiesIdentity (music)PsychologySociologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fleeing Homophobia: Sexual orientation, gender identity and asylum, edited by Thomas Spijkerboer, brings together scholars from distinct fields (such as law, migration and conflict management) to explore the major legal issues arising in relation to LGBTI people seeking asylum in Europe, while also considering the context of refugee law in non-European settings such as Canada, Australia and the United States. Organised into ten chapters, including the introduction, it attempts to provide the reader with an examination of both the general EU legislation and the specific cases of Member States. The collection brings together chapters emerging from the Fleeing Homophobia conference, which took place in Amsterdam in 2011. The volume begins with the refugee definition provided by the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, highlighting that sexual orientation and gender identity are not mentioned therein, and noting that these have gradually been recognised as persecution grounds in the last years. The first chapter, by Jansen, presents the outcomes of the Fleeing Homophobia research project which explored issues affecting LGBTI asylum seekers such as credibility, late disclosure, and reasons employed to reject asylum applications (the possibility of hiding one’s gender identity or sexual orientation, or the absence of legislation criminalising same-sex acts in a country of origin). This is an important chapter, since it draws the reader into the realities faced by LGBTI asylum seekers and is easy to read by a non-expert audience. The author also stresses the lack of research focusing on lesbian, bisexual, trans and intersex people. While their underrepresentation is obvious, an increasing number of works on lesbian (see Bennett and Thomas, 2013; and the work of Rachel Lewis, 2010 and 2013) and trans (see Gowin et al, 2017; Waynet, 2016; Bach, 2013; Jenkins, 2009) asylum seekers has been published in the years before and after Fleeing Homophobia was printed in hardback (2013), and more recently in paperback (2015). Jansen’s contribution reveals the existing discordances between Member States’ protection of LGBTI refugees and EU standards, which is extremely relevant in the context of the contemporary refugee landscape in Europe. The introduction, however, does not provide a nuanced or consistent definition of the acronym LGBTI, which is used interchangeably throughout the book with LGBT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it