MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772876799 · doi:10.4000/books.igpde.4663

Les réformes bancaires et financières de 1966‑1967

2005· book-chapter· fr· W2772876799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBusinessArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si l’action de Michel Debré rue de Rivoli dépasse largement le cadre économique et financier, les réformes qu’il a mises en place dans ce domaine en sont néanmoins les plus connues, et cela non sans raison. Les mesures prises en deux ans, certaines dès 1966, d’autres à la faveur des ordonnances d’août à octobre 1967, constituent en effet un train de réformes de structure impressionnant, à la fois par son ampleur et sa concentration dans le temps, qui fut salué par les observateurs contemporai...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it