MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772894260

Unsaturated water liquid transport insoftwoods

2009· book· en· W2772894260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luís Ibarra

Bibliographic record

VenueVDM Verlag Dr. Müller eBooks · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCladding (metalworking)Building envelopeWettingLiquid waterInfiltration (HVAC)Materials scienceMoistureComposite materialWater transportWater contentEnvironmental scienceWater vaporOrthotropic materialAbsorption of waterVapor phaseEnvironmental engineeringGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringWater flowMeteorologyGeologyFinite element methodGeographyThermodynamics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a construction material, wood is used in structural elements and building envelope components such as window frames and cladding. These wooden components are exposed to wetting by rain either directly (cladding) or as a result of a failure (rain infiltration). When the moisture content levels are within a certain range, mold growth and rot can occur, which may be detrimental for the health of the occupants, decrease structural strength and destroy the aesthetic appearance of a building. In the hygroscopic range (vapour phase), a well-developed theory explains the absorption of water in the vapor phase when the relative humidity is withing 0 to 95%. However, liquid mass directional diffusivities of water for many Canadian wood species have not yet been investigated. The main objectives of this study were to quantify averaged values of directional diffusivities for a specific type of wood (jack pine), and to develop a transient modeling approach for liquid-phase water transport in wood considering the orthotropic effect of the wood structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVDM Verlag Dr. Müller eBooksSame topicHygrothermal properties of building materialsFrench-language works237,207