MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2772970961 · doi:10.1175/bams-d-16-0162.1

The Environment Canada Pan and Parapan American Science Showcase Project

2017· article· en· W2772970961 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Paul Joe, Stéphane Bélair, Natacha B. Bernier, V. S. Bouchet, J. R. Brook, Dominique Brunet, William R. Burrows, Jean‐Pierre Charland, Armin Dehghan, N. Driedger, Carole P. Duhaime, Greg J. Evans, A.-B. Filion, R. Frenette, J. de Grandpré, Ismail Gültepe, Dave Henderson, Alexandria J. Herdt, Nathan Hilker, Laura X. Huang, Eddie Hung, George A. Isaac, Cheol–Heon Jeong, David H. Johnston, Joan Klaassen, Sylvie Leroyer, Hai Lin, Melinda H. MacDonald, Josh MacPhee, Zen Mariani, Tony Munoz, J. Reid, A. Robichaud, Yves Rochon, Kerolyn K. Shairsingh, David Sills, Ľuboš Spaček, Craig Stroud, Yaling Su, Neil Taylor, Jennifer Vanos, James Voogt, Jonathan M. Wang, Timothy Wiechers, Sumi N. Wren, Huang Yang, Terry Yip

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityMinistry of EnvironmentMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksUniversity of TorontoEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsThunderstormMeteorologyGlobeEnvironmental scienceGovernment (linguistics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Pan and Parapan American Games (PA15) are the third largest sporting event in the world and were held in Toronto in the summer of 2015 (10–26 July and 7–15 August). This was used as an opportunity to coordinate and showcase existing innovative research and development activities related to weather, air quality (AQ), and health at Environment and Climate Change Canada. New observational technologies included weather stations based on compact sensors that were augmented with black globe thermometers, two Doppler lidars, two wave buoys, a 3D lightning mapping array, two new AQ stations, and low-cost AQ and ultraviolet sensors. These were supplemented by observations from other agencies, four mobile vehicles, two mobile AQ laboratories, and two supersites with enhanced vertical profiling. High-resolution modeling for weather (250 m and 1 km), AQ (2.5 km), lake circulation (2 km), and wave models (250-m, 1-km, and 2.5-km ensembles) were run. The focus of the science, which guided the design of the observation network, was to characterize and investigate the lake breeze, which affects thunderstorm initiation, air pollutant transport, and heat stress. Experimental forecasts and nowcasts were provided by research support desks. Web portals provided access to the experimental products for other government departments, public health authorities, and PA15 decision-makers. The data have been released through the government of Canada’s Open Data Portal and as a World Meteorological Organization’s Global Atmospheric Watch Urban Research Meteorology and Environment dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the American Meteorological SocietySame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207