Large-scale structure phenomenology of viable Horndeski theories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phenomenological functions $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ and $\ensuremath{\mu}$, also known as ${G}_{\text{light}}/G$ and ${G}_{\text{matter}}/G$, are commonly used to parametrize modifications of the growth of large-scale structure in alternative theories of gravity. We study the values these functions can take in Horndeski theories, i.e., the class of scalar-tensor theories with second order equations of motion. We restrict our attention to models that are in broad agreement with tests of gravity and the observed cosmic expansion history. In particular, we require the speed of gravity to be equal to the speed of light today, as required by the recent detection of gravitational waves and electromagnetic emission from a binary neutron star merger. We examine the correlations between the values of $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ and $\ensuremath{\mu}$ analytically within the quasistatic approximation and numerically by sampling the space of allowed solutions. We confirm that the conjecture made in [L. Pogosian and A. Silvestri, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104014 (2016)], that $(\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}\ensuremath{-}1)(\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{-}1)\ensuremath{\ge}0$ in viable Horndeski theories, holds very well. Along with that, we check the validity of the quasistatic approximation within different corners of Horndeski theory. Our results show that, even with the tight bound on the present-day speed of gravitational waves, there is room within Horndeski theories for nontrivial signatures of modified gravity at the level of linear perturbations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".