MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773038736 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2017.2772208

A Sub-mW Integrating Mixer SAR Spectrum Sensor for Portable Cognitive Radio Applications

2017· article· en· W2773038736 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Banović, Anthony Chan Carusone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCapacitorBandwidth (computing)Electronic engineeringChipSuccessive approximation ADCTransceiverDynamic rangeCognitive radioComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringWirelessEngineeringTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low power mixed-signal integrating mixer successive approximation register (SAR) architecture is proposed for direct spectrum estimation in portable transceivers targeting IEEE 802.22 wireless regional area network cognitive radio applications. The integrating mixer SAR implements the short-time Fourier transform in the analog domain and digitizes its amplitude at the end of the integration period. The architecture consists of an array of folded double balanced mixers connected to a common subset of binary-weighted capacitive loads. Current domain windowing is applied in the first stage followed by mixing, integration and analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) in the second stage. Windowing sets the detection bandwidth and provides flexible low pass filtering while a load capacitor array enables integration with programmable time constant and acts as the sampling capacitors of a SAR ADC. A prototype chip is fabricated in IBM's 0.13μm CMOS process. The measured results indicate an average dynamic range of 27.9-25.7 dB over a frequency range of 0.05-1.25 GHz, while consuming 0.88 mW from 1.1/1.2 V supplies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207