MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773051758 · doi:10.1109/icrera.2017.8191193

A novel online adaptive fast simple state of charge estimation for Lithium Ion batteries

2017· article· en· W2773051758 on OpenAlexaff
Fereshteh Poloei, Alireza Bakhshai, Yan‐Fei Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)State of chargeComputer scienceVoltageEstimation theoryEquivalent circuitLithium-ion batteryControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel simple adaptive and online approach to estimate the state of charge (SOC) in Lithium Ion (Li-Ion) batteries based on a new model parameter identification method. First, a novel discrete model for the Li-ion battery is developed. This model is the key step in the development of the proposed parameter estimation algorithm. The estimated parameters are used for on-line calculation of the battery's open circuit voltage (VOC) that is required for SOC estimation with no prior knowledge of battery parameters. The paper then proposes a moving window lease mean square approach to adaptively update the estimated parameters in a very fast and accurate manner. The SOC estimation will be updated at the end of every window cycle. The proposed method for SOC estimation provides a simple, fast, comprehensive, and precise estimation capable to track the changes of the model/battery parameters. Unlike other estimation strategies, only battery terminal voltage and current measurements are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207