MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773076499 · doi:10.1080/00103624.2017.1416127

Phosphorus Fractions in Sodic Soils of the Great Ethiopian Rift Valley Soils as Affected by Reclamation

2017· article· en· W2773076499 on OpenAlexaff
Kiros Alemayehu, B. Sheleme, J.J. Schoenau

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGypsumSoil waterTotal organic carbonPhosphorusFractionationLand reclamationEnvironmental chemistrySodic soilChemistrySoil carbonEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceAgronomyGeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil phosphorus (P) availability is commonly assumed to limit productivity in tropical soils, yet there is relatively little information on the chemical forms of soil P in such ecosystems. The study was conducted to determine the size P pools via application of gypsum. We used a sequential fractionation to assess P fractions. The average total P concentration was 519 mg kg−1. Soil organic P was relatively low (74 mg kg−1). The ratio of organic carbon to organic P was generally greater than 298, suggesting the potential for immobilization. Calcium-associated P was the dominant inorganic P pool, whereas Al+Fe-P was the second dominant. Readily available P was very low (1.3 mg kg−1). Gypsum at different level was used as a reclamation material for sodic soils, and application of gypsum significantly affected the different P fractions. Organic P forms were significantly lower for higher levels of gypsum application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207