MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773100

The Future of Engineering Education: Part 2. Teaching Methods That Work.

2000· article· en· W2773100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineering educationWork (physics)Engineering ethicsScience educationEngineeringHigher educationTeaching methodMathematics educationEngineering managementEngineering physicsMechanical engineeringPsychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the period 1980-1987, Clostridium septicum was identified at Statens Seruminstitut, from anaerobic blood cultures in six patients. Five of the patients had cancer of the colon or rectum (c. coli) and one had cancer of the ovary. Correspondingly great incidence of solid tumours, particularly c. coli with C. septicum infection without preceding trauma or compromizing of immunity has been reported in the literature. Meticulous bacteriological identification should be undertaken on anaerobic culture as the finding of C. septicum in the blood should instigate investigation for c. coli or another form of solid tumour if no other explanation for the infection is available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it