Indicatie economische gevolgen fipronilaffaire voor de pluimveesector : Op basis van beschikbare informatie voor zover bekend op 22 september 2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bij het bestrijden van bloedluis in stallen van leghennen is achteraf gebleken dat bij een grote groep bedrijven het verboden middel fipronil is gebruikt.Als gevolg hiervan is eind juli van dit jaar door de Nederlandse Voedsel-en Warenautoriteit (NVWA) een grote groep bedrijven met pluimvee geblokkeerd.Van deze bedrijven mogen geen kippen, eieren en mest het terrein af.Deze nota geeft een indicatie van de directe economische schade voor de Nederlandse pluimveesector op basis van de beschikbare informatie voor zover bekend op 22 september 2017.In recent months, it has come to light that a large group of farms had used the forbidden insecticide Fipronil to control red poultry mite.As a result, the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA) imposed a transport ban on products from several poultry farms at the end of July this year.This means that no poultry, eggs or manure may leave these farms.This policy document sheds light on the direct economic damage to the Dutch poultry sector, as calculated according to the information available as of 22 September 2017.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".