MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773271053 · doi:10.1111/jpc.13724

Late Dumping Syndrome in a 17‐Year‐Old Female With Charge Syndrome

2017· letter· en· W2773271053 on OpenAlexaff
Angus P. Morgan, Alexandra Hudson, Angela Arra‐Robar, Kim Blake

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCHARGE syndromeMedicineDumping syndromeColobomaSurgeryPediatricsInternal medicineGastrectomyOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We would like to draw your attention to a digestive disorder that has not been previously described in CHARGE syndrome. CHARGE syndrome is a mnemonic that stands for some of the common clinical features: coloboma of the eye, heart problems, atresia/stenosis of the choanae, retardation of growth and/or development, genitourinary abnormalities, and ear anomalies. A 17-year-old female with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of CHARGE syndrome presented to her general paediatrician's clinic describing newly occurring symptoms of lightheadedness, dizziness and a blurred visual field with black dots, approximately 1 h after a meal. Her CHARGE syndrome features1 included retinal coloboma; choanal stenosis and atresia; semicircular canal hypoplasia; cranial nerve dysfunction (absent sense of smell, facial palsy, hearing and swallowing impairment); ear malformations; heart defects; developmental delay; and genitourinary abnormalities. Past surgical history included two Nissen fundoplication surgical procedures (age 3 and 9 years) to treat her severe gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastrostomy tube feeding was necessary up until 13 years of age. The adolescent was diagnosed with late dumping syndrome, which refers to symptoms and signs of reactive hypoglycaemia when food reaches the small bowel too rapidly, as the presence of glucose in the jejunum is a strong stimulus for insulin secretion.2 It can occur after a gastrectomy, oesophageal surgery or even after no surgery. Symptoms include hypoglycaemia, perspiration, palpitations, hunger, weakness, confusion, tremor and syncope.2 First line treatment consists of consuming smaller amounts of food in one sitting, delaying liquid intake until at least 30 min after a meal and avoiding sweetened foods.2 Nissen fundoplication is one of the most common surgical procedures undergone in CHARGE syndrome to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease, with some individuals undergoing this procedure two or three times due to a high failure rate.1, 3 Late dumping syndrome has not been previously reported in the CHARGE syndrome literature. Its presentation may be unique in CHARGE syndrome, with symptoms presenting up to a decade after surgery. Furthermore, the treatment recommendations can be difficult to implement as individuals often display difficult feeding behaviours such as pocketing of food in cheeks, over-stuffing one's mouth with food or consuming texture-restricted diets (e.g. puree only) (Table 1).3 These feeding challenges are often not elicited in the general history. It is known from the CHARGE syndrome Facebook page and the International CHARGE conferences that the symptoms of late dumping syndrome are not unusual. Continual surveillance for late dumping syndrome should be a standard part of health care management in CHARGE syndrome. The newly developed checklist4 can aid in health supervision across the lifespan, making sure that new issues are not missed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Paediatrics and Child HealthSame topicCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207