MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773372241 · doi:10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v3.28661

François Séguin, D’obscurantisme et de lumières : la bibliothèque publique au Québec des origines au 21e siècle

2017· article· fr· W2773372241 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Mélanie Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Academic Librarianship · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À peine un obstacle est-il disparu qu'il s'en dresse un autre.Les douze travaux d'Hercule pâlissent auprès de cette tâche impossible » (439).Cette citation du 2 juillet 1912, tirée de La Presse par l'auteur pour illustrer les difficultés entourant la fondation de la Bibliothèque Municipale de Montréal, résume bien l'histoire des bibliothèques publiques au Québec.Ce fut une trajectoire tortueuse semée d'embûches idéologiques et politiques et, pour reprendre le titre de l'ouvrage, relevant davantage de l'obscurantisme que des lumières.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0190.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Academic LibrarianshipSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207