MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773386950 · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.12.006

Determining mRNA half-lives on a transcriptome-wide scale

2017· article· en· W2773386950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTranscriptomeMessenger RNAComputational biologyTranscription (linguistics)RNABiologyCell biologyGene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Every step in the life cycle of an RNA transcript provides opportunity for regulation. One important aspect of post-transcriptional control is the regulation of RNA stability. Of the many strategies for determining mRNA stability, transcription inhibition and metabolic labeling have proved the most amenable to high-throughput analysis and have opened the door to dissecting mRNA decay transcriptome-wide. Here, we describe experimental and computational methods to determine transcriptome-wide RNA stabilities using both pharmacological inhibition of transcription and metabolic labeling. To aid in the analysis of these experiments, we discuss key characteristics of high-quality experiments and address other experimental and computational considerations for the analysis of mRNA stability. Broader application of these approaches will further our understanding of mRNA decay and illuminate its contribution to different biological processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it