MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773417769 · doi:10.4000/cdlm.8768

Geneviève Goussaud-Falgas, Le Consulat de France à Tunis aux xviie et xviiie siècles. Vie quotidienne, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2014, 304 p.

2017· article· fr· W2773417769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jörg Ulbert

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la Méditerranée · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les monographies qui traitent dans la diachronie d’un consulat français sont clairsemées. Jacques Caillé s’est penché sur le consulat de Tanger. Bernard Gille a consacré sa thèse à celui d’Alger, Mathieu Jestin la sienne à celui de Salonique et A. Siorokas Georgios la sienne à celui d’Arta. D’une manière chronologiquement plus resserrée, Julien Sempéré a étudié à deux reprises le poste de Barcelone, et Pierre Savard ceux de Québec et de Montréal.On peut donc désormais ajouter Tunis à cette l...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de la MéditerranéeSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207