MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773452463 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01445

Halogen-Bonded Cocrystals as Optical Materials: Next-Generation Control over Light–Matter Interactions

2017· article· en· W2773452463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCocrystalMaterials scienceNanotechnologyPhosphorescenceCrystal engineeringSupramolecular chemistryHalogenHalogen bondOptical materialsFluorescenceOptoelectronicsMoleculeChemistryOpticsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review summarizes the recent advances in utilizing halogen bond-driven cocrystal formation as a design element in the creation of optical or photoresponsive materials, notably cocrystals and liquid crystals. The extensive work over a relatively short time has demonstrated halogen bonding as a versatile supramolecular interaction capable of creating libraries of fluorescent, phosphorescent, dichroic, photoswitchable, as well as photomechanical crystals and liquid crystals. Such rapid development, and the diversity of materials properties that have been designed or fine-tuned with success, signal the emergence of halogen-bonded cocrystallization as an exciting new playground for crystal engineers, chemists, and physicists to develop next-generation optical materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it