Réflexions sur les contours flous des limites entre travail domestique et servitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que l’usage du concept de servitude dans la définition légale internationale de la traite des personnes illustre un intérêt renouvelé pour celui-ci, il demeure flou et indéfini. Cet article s’efforce d’apporter un éclairage nouveau sur les significations contemporaines qui peuvent être attribuées à la servitude domestique dans la loi internationale, tout en réfléchissant à la nature floue des frontières entre le travail domestique et la servitude. Cet article s’appuie sur le Programme des aides familiaux du Canada (AF) comme étude de cas pour montrer comment ces frontières floues sont constituées, notamment du fait des dispositions légales qui encadrent l’AF, en faisant valoir que le permis de travail lié à un employeur donné, articulé à la nature privée et isolée du lieu de travail, crée des vulnérabilités qui rendent plus probables l’émergence des conditions de servitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.048 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".