MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773506193 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2017.8127752

Post-typhoon assessment of surface greenness disturbance using Landsat series observations

2017· article· en· W2773506193 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Chen, Jonathan Li, Cheng Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTyphoonEnvironmental scienceUrbanizationContext (archaeology)Disturbance (geology)Extreme weatherClimatologyGlobal warmingBaySatelliteRemote sensingClimate changeMeteorologyPhysical geographyGeographyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extreme climate events are projected to increase under the context of global warming associated with the increase in greenhouse gas emissions. In particular, coastal regions which are also characterized with significant urbanization will be vulnerable to the extreme events, such as severe typhoon. Timely assessment and accurate information on the extent and severity of the damage caused by extreme event is necessary to better facilitate decision-making for disaster alleviation and post-recovery. Satellite remote sensing has an important advantage in assessing the impacts caused by extreme events on natural environment and socio-economic dimension at a variety of spatial and temporal scales. Surface greenness disturbance mainly over Xiamen, China, caused by Typhoon Meranti (2016) was investigated using a pair of observations by Landsat 7 ETM+ and Landsat 8 OLI. Significant decreases in greenness were detected, which mainly located along the Maluan Bay and the settlements in suburban and rural areas surrounding the track of typhoon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207