MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773577271 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2017.2782707

Performance Enhancement of Nanoscale VO<sub>2</sub> Modulators Using Hybrid Plasmonics

2017· article· en· W2773577271 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsExtinction ratioPlasmonOptical modulatorWaveguideDielectricRefractive indexModulation (music)Bandwidth (computing)Phase modulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vanadium dioxide (VO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> ) is a phase change material (PCM) that exhibits a large change in complex refractive index on the order of unity upon switching from its dielectric to its metallic phase. Although this property is key for the design of ultracompact optical modulators of only a few microns in footprint, the high absorption of VO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> leads to appreciable insertion loss (IL) that limits the modulator performance. In this paper, through theory and numerical modeling, we report on a new paradigm, which demonstrates how the use of a hybrid plasmonic waveguide to construct a VO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> based modulator can improve the performance by minimizing its IL while achieving high extinction ratio (ER) in comparison to a purely dielectric waveguide. The hybrid plasmonic waveguide that contains an additional metal layer with even higher loss than VO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> enables unique approaches to engineer the electric field (E-field) intensity distribution within the cross section of the modulator. The resulting figure-of-merit, FoM = ER/IL, is much higher than what is possible by simply incorporating VO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> into a silicon wire waveguide. A practical modulator design using this new approach, which also includes input and output couplers yields ER = 3.8 dB/μm and IL = 1.4 dB/μm (FoM = 2.7), with a 3-dB optical bandwidth >500 nm, in a device length = 2 μm, and cross-sectional dimensions = 200 nm × 450 nm. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the smallest modulator designs proposed to date that also exhibits amongst the highest ER, FoM, and optical bandwidth, in comparison to existing designs. In addition to VO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> , we investigate two other PCMs incorporated within the waveguide structure. The improvements obtained for VO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> modulators do not extend to other PCMs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it