MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773602264 · doi:10.1109/edssc.2017.8126542

A specific data transfer controller for multiple crypto IPs in a security processor

2017· article· en· W2773602264 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Di Wang, Liji Wu, Xingjun Wu, Xiangyu Li, Xiangmin Zhang, Yanqi Fu, Quan Peng He

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaSustainable Development Technology Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceEncryptionEmbedded systemCryptographyPipeline (software)Transfer (computing)Controller (irrigation)Process (computing)Data transmissionComputer hardwareParallel computingOperating systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a complex security SoC, multiple crypto IP cores are used in real-time, which brings a lot of interruptions to CPU by regular solutions. In this regard, a specific data transfer controller(SDTC) is proposed in this work, which can process encryption and decryption tasks with pipelined operations. Using SDTC to process these tasks can economize CPU source to improve entire performance of SoC. Besides, due to pipeline and embedded structure of crypto IPs, to encrypt/decrypt using SDTC rather than DMA has much higher data transfer rate and much less access to system bus. By simulation result, the solution using SDTC has approximately 0 access to system bus in average and a data transfer rate, which is approximately 2 times as using DMA. As the role of cryptographic algorithm AES-128/192/256 and SM4 are used. The SDTC has been successfully integrated in a security SoC, which will be taped out very soon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207