MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2773734238 · doi:10.5114/pjp.2017.71539

Quiz. What is your diagnosis?

2017· article· en· W2773734238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Iga Alicja Fudyma, Nitin R. Wadhwani

Bibliographic record

VenuePolish Journal of Pathology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineForamen magnumAnatomyForamenVentricleRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 11 month old female presented to the pediatrician with an increased head circumference.Head CT was reviewed and subsequent MRI revealed a heterogeneous enhancing mass involving the medial aspect of both the right and left cerebellar hemispheres (Fig. 1).The mass extended through the posterior foramen magnum and effaced the 4 th ventricle.The tumor was resected and appeared as a tan to white, firm, nodular mass measuring 4.2 × 1.8 × 0.7 cm in aggregate.An intraoperative smear and frozen section was performed.Microscopic sections were remark-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3150.194

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolish Journal of PathologySame topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207