Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’efficacité thérapeutique est au coeur de l’anthropologie médicale qui s’intéresse aux diverses pratiques de guérison à travers le monde. Il s’agit ici de reprendre ce débat à partir d’une recherche de terrain conduite au sein des pratiquesjamuà Yogyakarta (Jogja) à Java en Indonésie. La préparation et la consommation quotidienne de breuvages à bases de plantes, rhizomes, épices, écorces fraiches que l’on roule, presse, pile et liquéfie évoquent une efficacité thérapeutique située au niveau de l’expérience vécue. Nous emprunterons à la phénoménologie de la perception merleau-pontienne, à la pensée rhizomique deleuzo-guattarienne, ainsi qu’à la philosophie javanaise du corps qui permettent de comprendre cette efficacité thérapeutique comme ligne de fuite ou de déterritorialisation. Ce faisant, nous rappelons que l’efficacité thérapeutique réduite à des corrélations causales infra-phénoménales, tel que dans l’actuel standard scientifique de l’essai clinique randomisé (ECR), ne couvre pas de façon exhaustive l’expérience humaine du processus thérapeutique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".