High Voltage Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) antrum using an electroanatomic mapping system is standard of care for point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Focused ablation at critical areas is more likely to achieve intra-procedural PV isolation and decrease the likelihood for reconnection and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore this prospective pilot study is to investigate the short-term outcome of a voltage-guided circumferential PV ablation (CPVA) strategy. METHODS: We recruited patients with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The EnSite NavX system (St. Jude Medical, St Paul, Minnesota, USA) was employed to construct a three-dimensional geometry of the left atrium (LA) and voltage map. CPVA was performed; with radiofrequency (RF) targeting sites of highest voltage first in a sequential clockwise fashion then followed by complete the gaps in circumferential ablation. Acute and short-term outcomes were compared to a control group undergoing conventional standard CPVA using the same 3D system. Follow-up was scheduled at 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-four paroxysmal AF patients with a mean age of 40 years were included. Fourteen patients (8 male) underwent voltage mapping and 20 patients underwent empirical, non-voltage guided standard CPVA. A mean of 54 ± 12 points per PV antrum were recorded. Mean voltage for right and left PVs antra were 1.7±0.1 mV and 1.9±0.2 mV, respectively. There was a trend towards reduced radiofrequency time (40.9±17.4 vs. 48.1±15.5 mins; p=0.22). CONCLUSION: Voltage-guided CPVA is a promising strategy in targeting critical points for PV isolation with a lower trend of AF recurrence compared with a standard CPVA in short-term period. Extended studies to confirm these findings are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".